Differences between revisions 49 and 52 (spanning 3 versions) Back to page
Revision 49 as of 8:07AM, Oct 20, 2013
Size: 2231
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Revision 52 as of 1:31PM, Oct 29, 2014
Size: 2238
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
== Links, data == == Links+ ==
Line 17: Line 17:
  * The UCSC data analyzed in this paper were obtained by GHG at the SSRL.   * The UCSC data analyzed in this paper were obtained by the Gweon group at the SSRL.

Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL

Ever since the discovery of high temperature superconductors, these materials have been quite baffling, to say the least. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding so far. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

SSRL-ECFL-Ad

As the above advertisement of this UCSC work of ours (at Stanford Synchrotron) says, we might be onto solving this conundrum! Major help came from a theoretical breakthrough (ECFL) by Shastry, which seemed to shed light on a long-standing puzzle in high temperature superconductivity in a big way—explaining anomalous ARPES line shapes. But this is not all. Follow the links below, to see how this initial model (simplified ECFL) had to be modified to explain more data and to shed light on the superconductivity.

Links+