Research in the Gweon Group
| Differences between revisions 3 and 5 (spanning 2 versions) | Back to page |
|
Size: 572
Comment:
|
Size: 585
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| <<fl(E)>>ver since high temperature superconductors have been known to scientists, they have been quite baffling. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to describing these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why this general sense? It is, of course, because of many puzzling experimental results that the standard textbook theories have a hard time explaining. | <<fl(E)>>ver since high temperature superconductors have been known to scientists, they have been quite baffling. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious! <<lia(SSRL-ECFL-Advertisement.png)>> |
Strange line shapes and ECFL
Ever since high temperature superconductors have been known to scientists, they have been quite baffling. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!
