Differences between revisions 28 and 29 Back to page
⇤ ← Revision 28 as of 11:12AM, Oct 19, 2013 →
Size: 1789
Editor: Sam
Comment:
← Revision 29 as of 11:15AM, Oct 19, 2013 → ⇥
Size: 2038
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
As the above advertisement says, we might be onto solving this conundrum! The main impetus came from a <<ln("http://physics.ucsc.edu/~sriram/", "theoretical breakthrough by Shastry")>>. As the above advertisement says, we might be onto solving this conundrum! The main impetus came from a <<ln("http://physics.ucsc.edu/~sriram/", "theoretical breakthrough by Shastry")>>, which seemed to shed light on a long-standing puzzle in high temperature superconductivity&mdash;explaining anomalous ARPES line shapes.  Follow the links below, how this is done, and how phenomenological modifications led to further nice findings.

Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL

Ever since high temperature superconductors have been discovered by scientists, they have been quite baffling, to say the least. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/htsc.pdf

As the above advertisement says, we might be onto solving this conundrum! The main impetus came from a theoretical breakthrough by Shastry, which seemed to shed light on a long-standing puzzle in high temperature superconductivity—explaining anomalous ARPES line shapes. Follow the links below, how this is done, and how phenomenological modifications led to further nice findings.

UC Santa Cruz Department of Physics