Differences between revisions 26 and 27 Back to page
Revision 26 as of 10:41AM, Oct 19, 2013
Size: 1649
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Revision 27 as of 11:09AM, Oct 19, 2013
Size: 1676
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
<<fl(E)>>ver since high temperature superconductors have been known to scientists, they have been quite baffling. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious! <<fl(E)>>ver since high temperature superconductors have been discovered by scientists, they have been quite baffling, to say the least. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL

Ever since high temperature superconductors have been discovered by scientists, they have been quite baffling, to say the least. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/htsc.pdf

As the above advertisement says, we might be onto solving this conundrum!