Differences between revisions 21 and 25 (spanning 4 versions) Back to page
Revision 21 as of 9:18AM, Oct 19, 2013
Size: 1513
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Revision 25 as of 9:39AM, Oct 19, 2013
Size: 1597
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
<<lia(SSRL-ECFL-Advertisement.png, clickable = False)>> [[http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/htsc.pdf|{{attachment:SSRL-ECFL-Advertisement.png}}|class=none]]
Line 9: Line 9:
Links: ==== Links ====

  * The paper can be accessed from <<doi("10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056404","here")>> or <<ln("http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2631", "here (public)")>>.
Line 14: Line 16:
  * The paper can be accessed from <<doi("10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056404","here")>> or <<ln("http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2631", "here (public)")>>.

Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL

Ever since high temperature superconductors have been known to scientists, they have been quite baffling. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/htsc.pdf

As the above advertisement says, we might be onto solving this conundrum!