Differences between revisions 13 and 16 (spanning 3 versions) Back to page
Revision 13 as of 9:12AM, Oct 19, 2013
Size: 1317
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Revision 16 as of 9:14AM, Oct 19, 2013
Size: 1324
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 11: Line 11:
  * <<ln("http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/newsletters/headlines/headlines_10-11.html#Highlight1", "A news article about our work at the Stanford Synchrtron Lightsource.")>>
  * <<ln("http://news.ucsc.edu/2011/07/high-temperature-superconductors.html", "News article at UC Santa Cruz.")>>
  * The article can be accessed from <<ln("http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2631", "here")>> or <<doi("10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056404","here")>>.
  * <<ln("http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/newsletters/headlines/headlines_10-11.html#Highlight1", "A news article about our work at the Stanford Synchrtron Lightsource")>>.
  * <<ln("http://news.ucsc.edu/2011/07/high-temperature-superconductors.html", "News article at UC Santa Cruz")>>.
  * The paper can be accessed from <<doi("10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056404","here")>> or <<ln("http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2631", "here (public)")>>.

Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL

Ever since high temperature superconductors have been known to scientists, they have been quite baffling. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

Inlined image: SSRL-ECFL-Advertisement.png

As the above advertisement says, we might be onto solving this conundrum!

Links: