Research in the Gweon Group
| Differences between revisions 12 and 15 (spanning 3 versions) | Back to page |
|
Size: 1271
Comment:
|
Size: 1324
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 10: | Line 10: |
| * <<ln("http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR12/Event/160938", "March meeting 2012, Invited talk")>>—You can download my presentation! | * <<ln("http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR12/Event/160938", "March meeting 2012, Invited talk")>>and <<ln("http://absuploads.aps.org/presentation.cfm?pid=10188", "my presentation")>>. |
| Line 13: | Line 13: |
| * The article can be accessed from <<ln("http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2631", "here")>> or <<doi("10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056404","here")>>. | * The paper can be accessed from <<doi("10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056404","here")>> or <<ln("http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2631", "here (public)")>>. |
Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL
Ever since high temperature superconductors have been known to scientists, they have been quite baffling. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!
As the above advertisement says, we might be onto solving this conundrum!
Links:
A news article about our work at the Stanford Synchrtron Lightsource.
The paper can be accessed from here or here (public).