Differences between revisions 1 and 44 (spanning 43 versions) Back to page
Revision 1 as of 7:10PM, Jul 02, 2013
Size: 77
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Revision 44 as of 12:07AM, Oct 20, 2013
Size: 2248
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Extremely Correlated Fermi Liquid = == Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL ==
Line 3: Line 3:
This is a very interesting model!! <<fl(E)>>ver since the discovery of high temperature superconductors, these materials have been quite baffling, to say the least. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding so far. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

[[http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/htsc.pdf|{{attachment:SSRL-ECFL-Advertisement.png}}|class=none]]

As the above advertisement of this UCSC work of ours (at Stanford Synchrotron) says, we might be onto solving this conundrum! Major help came from a <<ln("http://physics.ucsc.edu/~sriram/", "theoretical breakthrough (ECFL) by Shastry")>>, which seemed to shed light on a long-standing puzzle in high temperature superconductivity in a big way&mdash;explaining anomalous ARPES line shapes. But this is not all. Follow the links below, to see how this initial model (simple ECFL) had to be modified to explain more data and to shed light on the superconductivity.

== Links, data ==

  * The paper can be accessed from <<doi("10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056404","here")>> or <<ln("http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2631", "here (public)")>>.
  * My invited talk at the March meeting 2012: <<ln("http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR12/Event/160938", "abstract")>> and <<ln("http://absuploads.aps.org/presentation.cfm?pid=10188", "presentation")>>
  * <<ln("http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/newsletters/headlines/headlines_10-11.html#Highlight1", "A news article about our work at the Stanford Synchrotron Lightsource")>>
  * <<ln("http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/htsc.pdf", "A science highlight article about our work at the Stanford Synchrotron Lightsource")>>
  * <<ln("http://news.ucsc.edu/2011/07/high-temperature-superconductors.html", "News article at UC Santa Cruz")>>
  * [[pECFL|Phenomenological ECFL]] and [[nMBDOS|more]]
  * The UCSC data analyzed in this paper were obtained by GHG at the SSRL.

Strange ARPES line shapes and ECFL

Ever since the discovery of high temperature superconductors, these materials have been quite baffling, to say the least. The central question is whether the standard textbook theories that we know and love already are applicable to these fascinating materials. The general sense is that those standard theories must be augmented to a great extent, if not replaced completely. Why? It is because of many puzzling experimental results that defy a proper understanding so far. ARPES results are among the most mysterious!

http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/htsc.pdf

As the above advertisement of this UCSC work of ours (at Stanford Synchrotron) says, we might be onto solving this conundrum! Major help came from a theoretical breakthrough (ECFL) by Shastry, which seemed to shed light on a long-standing puzzle in high temperature superconductivity in a big way—explaining anomalous ARPES line shapes. But this is not all. Follow the links below, to see how this initial model (simple ECFL) had to be modified to explain more data and to shed light on the superconductivity.

Links, data