Differences between revisions 2 and 3 Back to page
Revision 2 as of 1:24PM, Mar 14, 2015
Size: 1324
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 1:27PM, Mar 14, 2015
Size: 1339
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
   (b) This part is to be considered a bit out of the scope, since the change of $f$ due to the change in Snell's law is actually quite complicated. Additionally, we also must consider the fact that when the ray goes through the center, it is no longer a straight line. This is also due to Snell's law, and this change is simpler to figure out in small angle approximation. The combined effect of these two causes or the effect of the second cause alone (assuming that the object does not move) can be discussed. The answer is a bit ambiguous if the combined effect is considered.    (b) This part is to be considered a bit out of the scope, since the change of $f$ due to the change in Snell's law is actually quite complicated. Additionally, we also must consider the fact that when the ray goes through the center, it no longer goes through it as a straight line. This is also due to Snell's law, and this change is simple to figure out in small angle approximation. The combined effect of these two causes or the effect of the second cause alone (assuming that the object does not move) can be discussed. The answer is a bit ambiguous if the combined effect is considered.

Review problem 5:

  • Here there are two possible solutions. Two convergeing lenses can be used with a focal point between them. Or, a converging lens and a diverging lens with a focal point of the converging lens beyond the diverging lens.

Review problem 8:

  • (d) The relative intensity here must be discussed in terms of the N dependence of the intensity of the principal maximum peak. (See the later part of this video.)

Review problem 9:

  • Here, we can use $2 d \sin \phi = m \lambda$. $d$ is the spacing between lattice planes, and so is not equal to $a_0$. $\phi$ is not equal to $\theta$. (See this video).)

Review problem 10:

  • (b) This part is to be considered a bit out of the scope, since the change of $f$ due to the change in Snell's law is actually quite complicated. Additionally, we also must consider the fact that when the ray goes through the center, it no longer goes through it as a straight line. This is also due to Snell's law, and this change is simple to figure out in small angle approximation. The combined effect of these two causes or the effect of the second cause alone (assuming that the object does not move) can be discussed. The answer is a bit ambiguous if the combined effect is considered.