Physics 139B UCSC
| Differences between revisions 15 and 25 (spanning 10 versions) | Back to page |
|
Size: 2060
Comment:
|
Size: 1779
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 11: | Line 11: |
| * For problem 4 of the homework problem, it would be sufficient to prove that $\langle n^{(0)} | {\underline n}^{(j+1)} \rangle = 0$ for any $j = 0, 1, 2, ...$. The ket $| {\underline n}^{(j+1)} \rangle$ is defined in <<la("HW-2.4.png", this image)>>, where four completely equivalent statements are noted (green rectangle). The equivalence of these four statements can be proven based on Eqs. 3.19 and 3.20, alone. This is kind of demonstrated in this image, and you are ''not'' required to demonstrate it yourself. '''Just prove that $\langle n^{(0)} | {\underline n}^{(j+1)} \rangle = 0$ for any $j = 0, 1, 2, ...$ (using the proof by induction).'''—~-''<<DateTime(2013-10-14T15:35:34-0700)>>''-~ | * I guess I will see many of you tomorrow during my office hours ('''noon-2PM'''), during which we could work out some homework problems. In addition, please feel free to ask your questions on the forum or by email. '''Good (= sincere) discussions will really protect you in my course''', since (1) you are a learner—I/you/anybody should expect you be a knower already—and (2) your willingness to learn will make people (esp., me) respect you very much.—~-''<<DateTime(2013-10-20T20:10:29-0700)>>''-~ |
| Line 15: | Line 15: |
| * There are some discussions of homework problems in the <<ln(https://griffin.ucsc.edu/forum,forum)>>. Check them out!—~-''<<DateTime(2013-10-05T10:46:20-0700)>>''-~ * '''~+Welcome back, students!+~''' |
|
| Line 20: | Line 16: |
| <<h(<div style="margin-top: -1.0em; text-align: right;">)>>~-[[OldNews|Archived news items can be found here]].-~<<h(</div>)>> |
Welcome to Phys 139B, 2013!
I guess I will see many of you tomorrow during my office hours (noon-2PM), during which we could work out some homework problems. In addition, please feel free to ask your questions on the forum or by email. Good (= sincere) discussions will really protect you in my course, since (1) you are a learner—I/you/anybody should expect you be a knower already—and (2) your willingness to learn will make people (esp., me) respect you very much.—8:10PM, Oct 20, 2013
Office hours: Monday 12-2 PM, Thursday, Friday, 1-2 PM, or OBA. (Syllabus updated.)—7:34PM, Oct 13, 2013
Welcome to the second part of Quantum Mechanics!
In this course, you will learn how to use Quantum Mechanics, now that you have thoroughly learned, in 139A, what Quantum Mechanics is. (However, we will review the essentials of the formalism of Quantum Mechanics, as we begin 139B.) The topics to be covered include perturbation theories, the variational principle, scattering, the WKB approximation, the adiabatic principle and the Berry’s phase. These contents that you will learn will make you feel good, I believe, not only because you will learn to calculate things and apply your results to physical situations, but also because this process of using Quantum Mechanics will enrich your notion of what Quantum Mechanics really is all about.