Differences between revisions 1 and 8 (spanning 7 versions) Back to page
Revision 1 as of 9:18AM, Sep 27, 2011
Size: 578
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 9:30AM, Sep 27, 2011
Size: 777
Editor: Sam
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 A.  Yes
 B.  No
  A. Yes
  A. No
Line 10: Line 10:
Suppose that a linear transformation of a 2D vector space maps $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ to $\vec{a}$, and $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ to $\vec{b}$. The matrix that represents this linear transformation is Suppose that a linear transformation of a 2D vector space maps $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ to $\vec{a}$, and $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ to $\vec{b}$. (Recall that we consider $\vec{a}$ and $\vec{b}$ as column vectors.) The matrix that represents this linear transformation is
Line 12: Line 12:
  A. Yes
  B. N
  A. $\bigl(\vec{a}\quad \vec{b}\bigr)$
  A. $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} \vec{a}^t \\ \vec{b}^t \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$
  A. None of the above.

Linear transformation and matrix

A matrix represents a linear transformation of vectors. Is the reverse true? Namely, can any linear transformation (of a finite dimensional vectors) be represented by a matrix?

  1. Yes
  2. No

Matrix and linear transformation

Suppose that a linear transformation of a 2D vector space maps $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ to $\vec{a}$, and $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ to $\vec{b}$. (Recall that we consider $\vec{a}$ and $\vec{b}$ as column vectors.) The matrix that represents this linear transformation is

  1. $\bigl(\vec{a}\quad \vec{b}\bigr)$

  2. $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} \vec{a}^t \\ \vec{b}^t \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$

  3. None of the above.